A History of Britain: At the Edge of the World? - 3000 BC-AD 1603 v.1: At the Edge of the World? - 3000 BC-AD 1603 Vol 1

While sticking to a script familiar to anyone who sat up and listened in history lessons at school, Schama brings it all alive, with memorable prose--Simon de Montfort's rebel parliament is described as inaugurating the "union between patriotism and insubordination"; with Henry VIII, Schama says, "you could practically smell the testosterone". And with fine sensitivity too, particularly on the symbolism of buildings, memorials, language and ceremonies, and on the complex relations between England and her Celtic and Catholic neighbours. If history must have gloss, then let it be written and presented like this. --Miles Taylor

Reader Reviews:

Informative and entertaining (1/1 people found this helpful)

This History of Britain vol. 1 is by no means exhaustive but that's not what it intends nor claims to be. Instead, you get an engaging page-turner, as addictive as the best detective or adventure novel, told by an expert in the matter and a consummate story-teller to boot. I bought this after having seen the BBC series but, trust you me, the book is even better!

Racing with rulers (12/12 people found this helpful)

This delightful romp through Britain's history from Roman to Elizabethan times is enchanting reading. Although mis-titled, since Schama dispenses with two millennia in but a few pages, his engrossing prose keeps your attention fixed through every page. He hasn't, of course, given us a "history of Britain" in any but a limited sense. The theme is the governance of a nation with expanding and contracting borders, rulers and those aspiring to rule drifting on and off the stage, and the politics of ruling such a land. The "life" of the country - the tillers, shepherds, artificers, fishermen, are pushed offstage unseen. Not intended as an academic study, it's an entertaining overview.

Schama's prose is often evocative. A prime example is his account of the preliminaries leading to the invasion at Hastings and the encounter itself. We witness, almost as participants, the victories and waning of Edward, king of Wessex. His successor, Harold, crosses the reach of England to defeat invading Vikings prior to the rush south to counter William of Normandy. At the battle site, Schama brings you onto the battle site, viewing the impending clash first from the English side, then from the Norman. You sweat and reflect, facing determined enemies prior to the onslaught. He moves you with the troops, thrusting, dodging, suffering as the battle rages. By the time you reach the pages of William's consolidating his victory, you are breathless. Schama is rarely detached from events throughout this book, and he has you at his side at every significant circumstance.

His discussions of the governance of Britain make compelling reading. Just as we thought the Domesday Book was little more than a tool of Norman oppression, Schama depicts William as "the first database king" bent on achieving equitable enforcement of justice. In later years, Henry II would continue that tradition, ruling medieval Europe's greatest empire. Without delving into tedious detail, Schama makes clear that ruling Britain at any level is a dynamic process. Although the successive monarchs may appear a continuum separated by some violent events, he demonstrates that whoever sat on the throne must perform the task of ruling. The methods may vary, sometimes harshly imposed, but tradition repeatedly impairs the march of change. Anyone failing to understand this will fail to understand Britain. [stephen a. haines - Ottawa, Canada]

A thematic approach (11/12 people found this helpful)

Schama's History of Britain was written to accompany the series of the same name. This first volume takes us up as far as 1603 and the death of Elizabeth I. The chapters in the book are long, and rather than a chronological Kings & Queens focus, Sharma has chosen themes, which coincide with the episodes of the television series. I do not wish to criticise this as an approach, because it does take a fresh approach to the subjects covered, but on the other hand it means that this is not a fully comprehensive History of Britain, indeed there is little on Scotland, Wales or Ireland, as such monumentous events as the Wars of the Roses are pretty much sidelined.

A super book (4/7 people found this helpful)

This series (both the TV and the books) are wonderful. It guides you gently through the main historical events of our country, gory details included - the type of things you actually remember and are interested, in rather than a dry narrative full of dull facts.

It is written in a very laid back, easy to read style by an academic - a 'practising historian' and focuses on the history of the people who made the events happen and their affect on our lives today. Beautiful photographs accompany the accounts... it is worth it just for the pictures!

A great history of (English) Britain (10/13 people found this helpful)

Despite its flaws, this is very good book. What Schama chronicles, hechronicles extremely well. The result is an imminently readable andenjoyable history. Throughout he uses clever literary devices worthy ofthe finest novelist in order to illustrate specific historicalsignificances. One fine example of this is the ghost of the EnglishCatholic church portrayed via the paintings of the apostles that peekthrough the cracked and decaying facade of Binham Priory.
But it is what Schama chooses not to chronicle that lets this book down. This is less a history of Britain than a history of English Britain. Scotland and Wales are often treated as afterthoughts, as though they haveno history of their own, other than how it relates to the English.
Then there is the matter of the War of the Roses and the succession ofsovereigns throughout that period. Up to this point the writer skillfullyconveys the succession to the throne with minimal confusion for the reader- no mean feat when one considers the entangled web of all the playersinvolved. But, at the forced abdication of Richard II Schama suddenlygathers pace, before disappearing into a fugue of impenetrability at thedeath of Henry V. He does warn us that one of the ways to view thisperiod is to "write off the entire sorry mess as the bloody bickering ofovergrown schoolboys . . ." - so his dismissive account should come as nosurprise.
Despite all this, however, Schama clearly has a great feel for what ismomentous in this period, and the book is so well written and enjoyablethat, if one can accept that it should be understood as the history ofEnglish Britain, then it seems churlish to judge the book too harshly.Four stars.

A History of Britain: At the Edge of the World? - 3000 BC-AD 1603 v.1: At the Edge of the World? - 3000 BC-AD 1603 Vol 1

Simon Schama

Editorial Review: